Friday, March 29, 2024

Bailable warrants against Sukhbir, Majithia on Justice Ranjit Singh plea

Date:

Chandigarh, March 25: The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday issued bailable warrants against Punjab’s former Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal and MLA Bikram Singh Majithia, but recalled the order later, on a petition filed by Justice Ranjit Singh.

A former Judge of the High Court, Justice Ranjit Singh had alleged attempts by the two to bring to disrepute a commission headed by him for probing the cases of sacrilege in the state.

File photo

 

Before parting with the order, Justice Amit Rawal directed the issuance of fresh notice to the two as per procedure prescribed under Section 204 of the CrPC. The order is being interpreted to mean that the two will now have to appear before the Bench on the next date of hearing.

Justice Rawal, during the course of hearing, observed that Majithia was not personally served. As per office report, his personal assistant jotted down the date. But there was no representation on his behalf. Justice Rawal also observed that notice issued to Sukhbir was received back with the report that some work was going on in the house and no one, as per the guard, was residing here.

Justice Rawal also took note of submission by Justice Ranjit Singh’s counsel APS Deol that the Court was empowered to issue warrant, in lieu of, or in addition, to summons. “… service upon the respondents be effected by way of bailable warrant through Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh as well as Amritsar,” Justice Rawal added.

Before parting with the case, Justice Rawal observed when the court was about to rise, its attention was drawn to the copy of the summons issued to Majithia with another title. “In my view, the particulars of the case were not correctly given on summons…. Since summons was sent by mentioning different case number and title, therefore, it is not a valid service,” Justice Rawal added. The official dealing with the matter was also directed to be careful in future after she appeared before the Bench and expressed remorse for the “inadvertence”.

Also Read: HC summons Sukhbir, Majithia over comments on Justice Ranjit Singh

Justice Ranjit Singh had moved the court for initiation of proceedings under Section 10A of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952. The provision deals with penalty for acts calculated to bring the commission or any of its members into disrepute.

If the first-of-its-kind plea is allowed, the respondents may find themselves facing proceedings for simple imprisonment for a term extending up to six months, or fine, or both. Section 10-A, among other things, say: “If any person, by words either spoken or intended to be read, makes or publishes any statement or does any other act, which is calculated to bring the Commission or any member thereof into disrepute, he shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.”

Discussions

Discussions

Punjabi Khurki
Punjabi Khurki
Punjab is no longer just a state but a State of Mind: A way to live!! ...So Let's Burrraaah with Punjabi Khurki!

Share post:

Subscribe

Advertisementspot_img
Advertisementspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

ED chief Sanjay Mishra gets tenure extension from SC till September 15

New Delhi, July 27: The Supreme Court on Thursday...

Patiala tops list of villages hit by recent floods; 27,286 evacuations carried out

Chandigarh, July 27: The State Government machinery has been...

Mann slams Modi govt, seeks President’s Rule in Manipur

New Delhi/ Chandigarh, July 27: Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant...

All pet shops, dog breeders in Punjab be registered with Animal Welfare Board

Chandigarh, July 27: In a bid to ensure the...